Aidoko windows for respite

Specifically, one of the pundits, Barrister Abdul Sadiq Esq, at the weekend, urged the Senate to reject the judgment of the court, and also cautioned the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on the consequences of issuing a certificate of return without carefully studying the implication of the judgment.

Speaking during a radio programme monitored in Abuja on Sunday, the legal practitioner said the constitution of Nigeria was unambiguous about the provisions of the law relating to the procedure of engagements and disengagements of members of the National Assembly and lawmakers.

His words: “The ambiguity occasioned by the judgment of the Federal High Court by given order of judgment to the Clerk of the Senate, will trigger another lacuna and constitutional crises when carefully studied, and only its un-applicability will give a leeway to legal interpretation on the Kogi East Senate judgment properly.

“According to the provisions, the Clerk of the Senate is the head of management, he or she has nothing to do with administering the oath of office of/on any senator, hence, the order of the Federal High Court was given to a wrong person.

“Further to these, Chapter 1 Order 7 of the Senate Standing Rules 2015, derived from section 60 of the constitution, obeying such order amounts to violating the constitution as the Clerk of the Senate is not party to the case and such an order of the court cannot be binding on him.

“You can’t give an order against someone who is not a party to the suit. The constitutional provision lies with the Senate President and not the Clerk, who without an order of the Senate can’t administer an oath of office on a senator, this has never been done anywhere.

“However, INEC’s decision on the issuance of certificate of return is a misnomer and the implication of the certificate issued to him was in bad faith. “Conversely, this is not new as Senator Albert Bassey, Akwa-Ibom North, is still in the Senate representing his constituency in spite of such certificate issued to Bassey Etim Akpan from the same area.

“Other instances include, two members of the House of Representatives from Enugu state are typical incidences of this aberration. There is already a Supreme Court decision that says, once there is a stay of order, an application for stay and notice of appeal, no party by decision of the Supreme Court is allowed to take further action”.

Leave a Reply