Bayelsa comment: Drama in Senate as Dickson, another Senator clash





 
Mild drama ensued on the floor of the Senate Tuesday between Senators  Aishatu Binani Ahmed (APC Adamawa Central) and Seriake Dickson (PDP Bayelsa West) over the smallness or otherwise of Bayelsa State .


Senator Aishatu Ahmed had in her lead presentation on a bill sponsored by her on the need for establishment of Federal Medical Centre Mubi, Adamawa state, veered off by alleging that the population in need of the facility in Mubi was more than that of some states like Bayelsa.


According to her the town, with a total land mass of 506.4km2 and population of 759,045, is neighbouring nine local government areas. 
“This together with the population of Mubi North makes it 2,089,540 people (very much higher than Bayelsa state’s eight local government areas, with a population of 1,704,515). 


“Nonetheless, this historic town has suffered from government neglect in terms of federal presence especially in the area of tertiary healthcare delivery.”
Angered by the submissions, Senator Dickson quickly raised up his hand which the President of the Senate mistook for intention to contribute to debate by obliging him .


After having the floor, Dickson wasted no time in reacting directly to the alleged smallness of Bayelsa state in population and size, by slamming Senator Binani and other past commentators, declaring that  figures presented are “not verifiable , making such remarks to be annoying and  provocative.” 
He angrily argued that the size of Bayelsa — the physical land mass and the water bodies — is three times bigger than some states in the country.


Binani, he thundered, could make her case without reference to Bayelsa. 
“In my Senatorial district, it will take me four days to go round. In my local government, Sagbama, it will take me three days to go round.
“I just felt I should rise up to enlighten the sponsor of this bill and by so doing the rest of the country.
“When people talk about population, they should be careful, because if you go deep and ask who conducted the census, who verified what and what are counted, who are the residents and how justifiable”, he asked.
In dousing the tension, the President of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan, quickly  interjected by  cautioning Dickson against inputting improper motives to the debate. 
“Apparently, I have to guide this contribution because you have made your point and, giving our standing orders, we shouldn’t impute improper motives on the submission by our colleagues.
“The discussion is not on the population of Bayelsa or population census conducted before, we should rather concentrate on the main focus, which is on the establishment of federal medical centres.
“I agree that there are many questions people will like to raise, but I think the essence of this debate is to focus on the general principles and the merits of the bill,” he  said.  
But Dickson reiterated his point that debates and the submissions in this hallowed chamber must be based on justifiable and verifiable  facts,  arguing that Binani referred to population figures which were not verifiable.


“I was only raised up to enlighten, without prejudice to the merits or demerits of the bill, that the premise that she has put forward as a reason or one of the reasons why this bill should be considered is faulty. 
“That should be expunged, it should not form part of it. That is not factual, it is incorrect,” Dickson fired back .


Again, Lawan cautioned Dickson against reducing the debate to reaction to comments.  “I’m sure that is the way you rounded up and let me also say that when you have an opportunity like this, what you do is, if you feel and convince that there is an erroneous presentation, you simply bring out the fact that this is wrong and this is correct. 
“We don’t have to come down and reduce the debate to reaction. You were in the House of Representatives before you became a governor, I’m very sure you are very conversant with our process here. We don’t input improper motives to debates or contributions or interventions by our colleagues,” Lawan pleaded.
The bill was however passed for second reading after the rancorous debate .

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply