Ex-Pension Boss Maina petitions AGF, wants charges reviewed

The former Chairman of the Pension Reform Task Team (PRTT), Mr Abdulrasheed Maina, Wednesday petitioned the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami SAN, demanding a review of the criminal charges filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). 

The petition was dated August 31, 2020, endorsed by Edwin Inegedu Esq. on behalf of Maina, and was made available to newsmen. 

In the petition, Maina told the AGF to, in the interest of justice, prevent the travesty, abuse of public office and malicious prosecutions being carried out by the EFCC against him by bringing his trial to a halt. 

He is praying the AGF to review all of the files involving the charges against him to ensure that his prosecution “is not malicious, mala fide and borne out of narrow interests to prevent accountability for the assets kept in the EFCC’s custody”.

The statement reads; “It is our further brief that our client’s persecution by the EFCC came to a head under the leadership of Mr Ibrahim Magu. 

“This was principally due to our client‘s demand that EFCC should account for the sums and properties recovered by the PRTT, and kept in the EFCC’s custody”.

“The demand by Maina became necessary as our client was consistently accused of diversion of the funds recovered instead of accounting for the sums and properties in its custody”.

Maina claimed that the EFCC maintained a campaign of calumny against him to obfuscate the issues and divert attention from its inability to account for the properties warehoused with it. 

“It is also pertinent to add that our client has despite the hordes of persecution and attacks on his person, aided the Federal Government in a further recovery of N1.3 trillion recently.

“It is thus imperative to state that our client has at all times performed in the best interest of the nation despite that his good intentions have become a subject of witch-hunt by the EFCC in recent times.

“The charges preferred against our client are a clear testimony of the abuse of prosecutorial powers and arbitrariness.

“It is an attempt at ensuring that our client remains perpetually damaged in his reputation and to render him incapable of voicing out the full extent of the good work his team carried out in the recovery of monies and properties for the benefit of the government at large” Maina’s lawyer wrote. 

Leave a Reply