Soldiers’ prosecution: AGF opens up on Wadume’s case

The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Abubakar Malami, said Wednesday that the federal government is not stopping prosecution of soldiers who fingered the case involving alleged Taraba kidnap kingpin, Bala Hamisu, popularly known as Wadume. Briefing State House correspondents after presentation to the virtual meeting of the Federal Executive Council (FEC) presided over by President Muhammadu Buhari in Abuja, the minister said the government is allowing the established processes to be consummated.

He said the identified soldiers can now face a court martial in line with military rules and traditions.
He said before the military releases its personnel for prosecution, they must go through in-house processes.
He said the charge in Wadume’s trial was severed to enable suspects that are available to be prosecuted as they cannot be held indefinitely in custody.“Now, coming to the issue of the soldiers, it is important for you to note that within the context of the Nigerian law, there are certain provisions that are exclusive to the military within the context of law on court martial and then, the internal discipline associated with the military.

“The soldiers can now be charged before court martial, and then for the military to release their personnel for prosecution, ordinarily, there are in-house processes and procedures that are to be consummated. So those that are handy for the purpose of prosecution cannot be held in custody for an unduly longer period of time on account of the absence of the military.

“So that is how the idea of severing the charge to allow those that are handy to stand their trail arose. That does not mean that by any means that the military are shielded and cannot be prosecuted. But if they have to be prosecuted, they have to be prosecuted within the context of the law. What is the law here? They are military personnel, first they are to go through the in-house processes.

“There are two options, either to charge them before the court martial which is a special court established by law for the trial of soldiers or in the alternative for the military after consummation of the in-house processes should consider handing them over for trial,” he said.

He said the Office of Attorney General of the Federation has the right to consider the interest of justice, public interest while ensuring the absence of abuse of process.
“On Wadume’s case, I would like you to note for the record that it’s the Office of Attorney General of the Federation that is constitutionally established to consider an interest of justice, public interest and ensure the absence of abuse in the judicial process.
“Within the context of public interest and the interest of justice, what we consider by way of fair hearing is that people that are charged to court are entitled to fair hearing, judicially determined within a reasonable time.

“Then, where people are charged multiple times on account of one reason or the other, they cannot collectively be brought before the court for arraignment on account that others are at large. Those that are available are entitled to have their case determined within a reasonable time.
“So, what has happened is perhaps a delay for a limited time to allow the processes recognized and realized by law to be consummated as it relates to the prosecution by the military as recognized by law and not in any way to intended to accord them protection in order to prevent them from being presented before the court. I hope that is clear,” he said.

Sign Up Now

ePaper Subscription

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.